Corpos digitais em trânsito. Criação artística contemporânea, inteligência artificial e a crítica decolonial
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumo
Este artigo desenvolve uma análise comparativa sobre o modo como três artistas visuais recorrem à Inteligência Artificial (IA) para pensar temas como o corpo feminino, o género e a experiência migratória, partindo de um viés decolonial. Partindo da literatura clássica e contemporânea sobre migração, estabelecemos um cruzamento desta esta base com um quadro teórico que articula o pós-humanismo feminista e com a crítica decolonial à arquitetura da IA, para argumentar que a IA funciona como um dispositivo estruturalmente ambivalente, na medida em que replica vieses coloniais e de género, mas é também apropriada pelas artistas como um instrumento de reinvenção do corpo feminino. Através de uma metodologia qualitativa que combina análise de conteúdo documental e visual, analisamos obras específicas de cada artista, sendo elas Tuty Moreno Campos, Rilda Paco e Morehshin Allahyari.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Referências
Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25(3), 336–351.
Birhane, A. (2020). Algorithmic colonization of Africa. SCRIPTed, 17, 389.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19.
Broeders, D. (2007). The new digital borders of Europe: EU databases and the surveillance of irregular migrants. International Sociology, 22(1), 71–92.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 77–91). PMLR.
Costa, P., & Ribas, L. (2019). AI becomes her: Discussing gender and artificial intelligence. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 17(1–2), 171–193.
Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2021). Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets. AI & Society, 36(4), 1105–1116.
Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch'ixinakax utxiwa: A Reflection on the Practices and Discourses of Decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95-109.
De Haas, H., Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2020). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Guilford Publications.
do Nascimento, E. S. (1996). Reflexão sobre alguns fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. Revista Educação em Questão, 6(2), 81–97.
Flückiger, B. (2008). Digital Bodies. In B. Flückiger (Ed.), Visual Effects: Filmbilder aus dem Computer (pp. 417–467). Schüren.
Ghatak, S., Levine, P., & Price, S. W. (1996). Migration theories and evidence: An assessment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(2), 159–198.
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Harper Business.
Guerra, P. (2025). Migrations, arts, and bodies: The silhouette in multiple shadows of Rubiane Maia. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, Artigo 1694064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1694064
Guerra, P. (2026). Migrações, artes e corpos: A silhueta em sombras de Rubiane Maia. In J. Cirilo & S. M. Sanmartin (Eds.), Estéticas e poéticas contemporâneas (pp. 196–235). Editora Universitária – Edufes.
Haraway, D. (2000). Manifesto ciborgue. In D. Haraway, H. Kunzru, & T. Tadeu (Eds.), Antropologia do ciborgue (pp. 33–118). Autêntica.
Haraway, D. (2023). A reinvenção da natureza: Símios, ciborgues e mulheres. WMF Martins Fontes.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies, 17(1), 13-26.
Hayles, N. K. (2006). Unfinished work: From cyborg to cognisphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 159–166.
Kabir, M. S., Sumi, E. J., & Alam, M. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and future immigration and border control. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 5(5), 1–7.
Lahiri, A. (2024). Visual sociology: Unveiling social realities through methodological tools and techniques. Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 11(5), 9812–9817.
Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
Lupton, D. (2020). Data selves: More-than-human perspectives. Polity Press.
Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4).
Mohamed, S., Png, M. T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8
Molnar, P. (2024). AI in border control and migration: Techno-racism and exclusion at digital borders. In Handbook on public policy and artificial intelligence (pp. 307–322). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Najmabadi, A. (2005). Women with mustaches and men without beards: Gender and sexual anxieties of Iranian modernity. University of California Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
Oliveira, N. H. D. (2024). A decolonial critical theory of artificial intelligence: Intersectional egalitarianism, moral alignment, and AI governance. Filosofia Unisinos, 25(1), Artigo e25114.
Parker, R. (2010). The subversive stitch: Embroidery and the making of the feminine (New ed.). I.B. Tauris.
Pauwels, L. (2010). Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(4), 545–581.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(2), 241–305.
Rees, P., & Lomax, N. (2019). Ravenstein revisited: The analysis of migration, then and now. Comparative Population Studies, 44.
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365.
Ricaurte, P., Zasso, M., & Cebral-Loureda, M. (2023). AI, ethics, and coloniality: A feminist critique. In What AI can do: Strengths and limitations of artificial intelligence (pp. 39–57).
Russell, L. (2020). Glitch feminism: A manifesto. Verso Books.
Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 48–63.
Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 80–93.
Sousa, S. (2024a). A deriva de Rubiane Maia entre o corpo-território no Sul Global. Farol, 20(31), 97–112.
Sousa, S. (2024b). “Headless women in public art”: Migrant artivism and do-it-yourself practices in the city of Porto. DIY, Alternative Cultures & Society, 2(1), 46–59.
Sousa, S. (2025). New forms of artivism in relation to contemporary societies: Tuty Moreno Campos's soft artivism. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, Artigo 1548970.
Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.