Reality capture and statistical modelling for digital water asset management: case study of hydraulic infrastructure in Brazil

Main Article Content

Wagner Carvalho
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-5406
Marta Castilho Gomes
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-7397
Rui Cunha Marques
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-5200

Abstract

The provision of water supply services continues to be a significant global challenge, with approximately 2 billion people lacking access to safe drinking water (UNICEF/WHO, 2023). Additionally, the water distribution sector faces substantial financial losses, estimated at $14 billion annually due to high levels of water loss in the distribution system (World Bank Group, 2022). In developing countries, the average water loss is 35%, reaching up to 70% in some regions, while in developed countries, this average is 15%.


The digital transformation promoted by Industry 4.0 has the potential to increase the efficiency of water service providers. The Digital Water program, launched by the International Water Association (IWA, 2022), exemplifies how digitalization can improve operational efficiency and water resource management. Asset management in the water supply sector needs to advance, particularly in the quality of the informational base, often characterized by low-reliability data.


The study presented in this paper analyzes the methodology of asset reality capture (Niles et al., 2022) and the data base of a water utility in Brazil. Uni and bivariate statistical models were used at the IBM SPSS software (Cronk, 2018) to analyze 2,584 assets belonging to 106 reservoirs (entities) municipalities, characterized in 2 context variables and 26 metric variables.


In the application of statistical modeling of data confirmed the informational insufficiency of physical assets of the water sector, and to present the descriptive measures of the quantity and condition of the assets in the plant by means of graphical representations, including histograms and bar graphs.


The results of bivariate analyses generated relevant insights for water asset management by demonstrating significant correlations between some variables derived from the categories, attributes, condition and context of the physical assets. As an example, the identification of the concentration of some deficient reservoirs in regions of Rio de Janeiro (high population density and high MHDI) is highlighted and this indication will guide the decision of the company to prioritize investments in these assets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Carvalho, W., Castilho Gomes, M., & Cunha Marques, R. (2024). Reality capture and statistical modelling for digital water asset management: case study of hydraulic infrastructure in Brazil. RAE—Journal of Engineering Assets, 2(2), 007–026. https://doi.org/10.29073/rae.v2i2.937
Section
Artigos

References

Alegre, H., Vitorino, D., & Coelho, S. (2014). Infrastructure value index: A powerful modelling tool for combined long-term planning of linear and vertical assets. Procedia Engineering, 89, 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.469

Almeida, N. (2023). Gestão de Ativos — 5ª edição: PorValor. IST — FUNDEC.

Alonso, P. J., Guillén, A. J., Gómez, J. F., & Candón, E. (2022). Review of asset digitalization models in the context of intelligent asset management and maintenance. In A. Crespo Márquez, J. F. Gómez Fernández, V. González-Prida Díaz, & J. Amadi-Echendu (Eds.), 16th WCEAM Proceedings (pp. 87–97). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25448-2

Amadi-Echendu, J. E., Brown, K., Willett, R., & Mathew, J. (2012). Asset condition, information systems and decision models: Approaches to information quality management (Vol. 2). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2924-0

Asian Development Bank. (2013). Water utility asset management: A guide for development practitioners.

Carvalho, W. O. (2021). BIM and AM to manage critical and relevant water and wastewater utilities assets. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering - ICCCBE 2020 (Vol. 98, pp. 697–720). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_49

Cronk, B. C. (2018). How to use SPSS®: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation (10th ed.). Taylor & Francis Group.

Grosch, R., & Bilot, P. (2002). A simple strategy for integrated plant management and control. In ISA Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Conference Proceedings (pp. 13–23).

Helfert, M., & Ge, M. (2007). A review of information quality research: Develop a research agenda. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220918901

Institute of Asset Management (IAM). (2015). An anatomy of asset management. https://www.theIAM.org

ISO Technical Committee 251. (2024). ISO/TC 251 asset management. https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc251/social-links/resources.html

ISO. (2014). ISO 55001:2014 Asset management—Management systems—Requirements. https://www.iso.org/standard/55089.html

ISO/FDIS 55013. (2024). Asset management—Guidance on the management of data assets. https://www.iso.org

IWA - Digital Water Programme. (2022). A strategic digital transformation for the water industry. IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781789063400

Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474

Marques, R. C. (Ed.). (2005). Regulação de serviços públicos. Sílabo. https://silabo.pt

Niles, J., McClure, S., & Pouliquen, D. (2022). Reality capture: A digital twin foundation.

O'Hanlon, T., & Gulati, R. (2020). 10 rights of asset management.

Rokstad, M. M., Ugarelli, R. M., & Sægrov, S. (2016). Improving data collection strategies and infrastructure asset management tool utilisation through cost benefit considerations. Urban Water Journal, 13(7), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2015.1024692

Silva, J. B. (2023). Structuring urban networks: Accessibility networks, road hierarchy and transport modes. http://pcp.vub.ac.be/MACRBOOK.html

SNIS/Trata-Brasil. (2024). Estudo de perdas de água de 2024 (SNIS, 2022): Desafios na eficiência do saneamento básico no Brasil. www.goassociados.com.br

UNICEF/WHO. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2022: Special focus on gender. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization (WHO). https://washdata.org

Vieira, J., Martins, J. P., de Almeida, N. M., Patrício, H., & Morgado, J. G. (2022). Towards resilient and sustainable rail and road networks: A systematic literature review on digital twins. Sustainability, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127060

World Bank Group. (2022). Water supply and sanitation policies, institutions, and regulation. www.worldbank.org