CHALLENGE-BASED LEARNING AND LEARNING DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THE HIGHER TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IN NEGOTIATION AND SALES
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze students' perceptions of the contribution of Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) to learning development in higher technological education, considering the dimensions of cognitive learning, critical thinking, academic motivation, meaningful learning, and collaborative learning. A quantitative, non-experimental, descriptive, and cross-sectional research design was adopted. The study involved 50 students enrolled in the Market Research course of the Higher Technology Program in Negotiation and Sales, who completed a market research project for a real organization as part of a challenge-based learning experience. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire consisting of 25 items measured on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) were employed to assess both the descriptive results and the psychometric properties of the instrument. The findings revealed favorable evaluations across all learning dimensions, with academic motivation (M = 4.50) and collaborative learning (M = 4.28) receiving the highest scores. The measurement instrument demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability values above 0.93 and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.74. Overall, the results suggest that students perceive Challenge-Based Learning as an effective pedagogical approach for promoting learning development through authentic, practice-oriented educational experiences.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in e3 – Journal of Economics, Business and Entrepreneurship in the community of Portuguese-speaking countries are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
This license allows users to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Andreucci-Annunziata, P., Riedemann, A., Cortés, S., Mellado, A., Del Río, M., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2023). Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1141686. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ayala, J. (2020). El aprendizaje basado en problemas y el desarrollo de las habilidades del pensamiento crítico. Educación UMCH, 15, 18. https://doi.org/10.35756/educaumch.202015.130
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
De Los Ríos, L., Zavaleta, H., & Herencia, C. (2020). Aprendizaje basado en retos en la formación previa y continua de estudiantes de pedagogía para educación básica alternativa. Educación UMCH. https://doi.org/10.35756/educaumch.202016.154
Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., & Walters, A. (2023). Defining active learning: A restricted systematic review. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 11, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25
Escriche, N., Rebollo, C., Rafferty, N., Recio, O., & Vidal, J. (2021). Aprendizaje basado en retos: Implementación interuniversitaria en la asignatura de mejora genética animal. Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Cooperación (CINAIC). https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0056
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. American Philosophical Association.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Ito, T., & Umemoto, T. (2022). Examining the causal relationships between interpersonal motivation, engagement, and academic performance among university students. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0274229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274229
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
López-Fraile, L., Agüero, M., & Jiménez-García, E. (2021). Efecto del aprendizaje basado en retos sobre las tasas académicas en el área de comunicación de la Universidad Europea de Madrid. Formación Universitaria, 14(5), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000500065
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.
Quintero, V., Palet, J., & Olivares, D. (2017). Desarrollo del pensamiento crítico mediante la aplicación del aprendizaje basado en problemas. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 21(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539201702111072
Sánchez, S., & Sotelo, J. (2021). Graduate profile in engineering students: Significant contributions of problem-based learning methodology. https://doi.org/10.17268/sciendo.2021.004
Sepúlveda, R., Hinojosa-Torres, C., Cortés-Roco, G., & Zavala-Crichton, J. (2024). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos y gamificación como estrategias de aprendizaje. Retos. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.107939
Xie, K., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Lu, L., & Cheng, S. L. (2020). A person-centered approach to examining students' motivation, engagement and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101877